Major sporting events occur across the globe on an annual basis (Summer Olympics, Winter Olympics, Commonwealth Games, Pan American Games, FIFA World Cup, IAAF World Championships, etc.) which bring with them significant benefits, but do these benefits justify the cost? Do major event organisers still believe they must provide iconic venues and facilities and will these permanent venues necessarily provide the lasting legacy required?

The eyes of the world will be watching — and event organizers must ask themselves if they want to be remembered for iconic facilities, such as the Bird’s Nest, or for potentially failing buildings as were seen in some recent events? Alternatively, can a temporary venue provide a better solution, or do they represent a false economy? Is there more to a temporary venue than meets the eye?

This paper explores the underlying drivers that are pushing organisers towards either permanent or temporary solutions for major events and considers the wider context in which organisers must deliver appropriate solutions.